Question: Many Muslim women who wear the purdah niqaab drive vehicles. It has become a normal practice. The Ulama, the vast majority or perhaps 99% of them, are all silent on this issue. They remove the niqaab while driving. Everyone can see them. When they stop, they lower their niqaabs. What is the status of these women drivers in the Shariah? What does Islam say about women driving cars?

Answer (by Mujlisul Ulama):

Their status is that of the faasiqaat (flagrantly sinful) and faajiraat (immoral). They are the tinder of Jahannam. The women drivers of today are all signs of Qiyaamah. Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“I take oath by The Being Who has sent me (as the Messenger) with the Haqq! This world will not end unless khasf, qazf and maskh occurs.” The Sahaabah asked: “And, when will that be?” Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “When you see women in the saddles (driving), when singing women are in abundance, when false testimony becomes prevalent, and when homosexuality and lesbianism are perpetrated.”

The prohibition of “driving in saddles’ is not restricted to horses. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) has mentioned this in the context of the Impending Hour of Qiyaamah. That is, in profusion women will be driving in the era in close proximity of Qiyaamah. We are today in that era of Aakhiruz Zamaan. This prediction has materialized and the satanic phenomenon of women driving is incremental.

Although the women who are observing mock ‘purdah’ believe themselves to be purdah-nasheen ladies, they dwell in satanic deception. The ‘surooj’ (saddles) mentioned by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) refers to the driving seat of modernday vehicles. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) lumped them together with homosexuals and lesbians. When these scoundrels begin to preponderate, then it heralds the close advent of Qiyaamah.

These driving faajiraat are absolutely shameless. They have eliminated every vestige of haya from their hearts. It is not possible for a Muslim woman who genuinely fears Allah Ta’ala to drive a car. Almost every step prior to the acquisition of a driving licence is lewd. The woman has to interact with males throughout the process before being granted the rubbish driving licence. We have seen such ‘burqah bibis’ standing in queues, intermingling with kuffaar males at traffic departments. They are tested by male traffic personnel.

The woman sits alone with him in the vehicle. Her husband or father is a veritable dayyooth for permitting this type of zina.

Aiding and abetting these women to flagrantly indulge in this type of zina and lewd public projection, are the ulama-e-soo’ – the juhala, moron molvis – which issue fatwas of ‘jawaaz’ (permissibility) for this type of swinery. The worst culprits and agents of Iblees in this regard are the Tablighi molvis who commit even the kufr of proclaiming ‘permissibility’ for women to travel without mahrams on tabligh excursions.

The Islamic Concept of Obedience to The Husband

Elaborating on the meaning of true obedience to the husband and observance of purdah, Hadhrat Maulana Masihullah (ramatullah alayh) said:
Ours mothers and sisters should listen attentively to the following episode which transpired during the time of Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
A Sahaabi once went on a journey of Jihad. When departing from home he instructed his wife to remain indoors, and never to set foot outside in his absence. That was the age of true purdah and virtue. It was not like today that we see husband and wife walking hand-in-hand in public, making a crude exhibition of themselves.
Our wise elders would usually say: “Once you have allowed you’re the feet of your wife to leave the threshold of the home, you will no longer be able to confine her to the sanctuary of the home. In fact you will frequently find her out of the home.”
Experience testifies to this reality. Men should blame themselves for the state of affairs in which there is the prevalence for non-observation of purdah.
After the Sahaabi had left, the lady’s father became very ill. He sent someone to call his daughter. She said to the messenger: “Ask Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) the mas’alah (rule of the Shariah). My husband has instructed me not to leave the precincts of the house. What should I now do?”
Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallum) sent the response to her query: “It is not permissible for you to go and visit your father.” The noble lady abided by the ruling of the Shariah issued by Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam). She did not go to visit her ailing father. Do you, O Brother and Sisters, understand her sterling qualities?
On the next day, a message was brought to her informing her that her father was on his deathbed and that she required to go and see him. However, the noble lady replied in the same manner, and Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) too responded in the same way as he did the previous day. On compliance with her husband’s instruction, she was not to set foot outside the house.
On the third day she was informed of the demise of her father. Once again she called to the home of her parents. She reacted in the same way, and Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Even now it is not permissible for her to leave the house. This her husband had forbidden. After her father was buried and Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) returned from the qabrustaan, Hadhrat Jibraeel (alayhis salaam) arrived with Wahi (Revelation) from Allah Ta’ala.
Rasulullah (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) sent a Sahaabi to deliver the following message to the lady who had not left her home: “Allah Ta’ala has sent Wahi and He has conveyed Salaams to you. Allah Ta’ala has forgiven your father because you obeyed the Shariah by abiding by the instruction of your husband not to leave the home.”
Before women frown on this episode and venture adverse comments on the attitude of the noble lady who had gained the special Salaam of Allah Ta’ala and forgiveness for her father, they should reflect and understand who the lady was, who had issued the ruling that she should remain indoors and visit her father notwithstanding his illness and death, and who ratified her action and was pleased with conduct? Allah and his Rasool upheld her conduct and she was assured of success and salvation in the Aakhirah. So-called purdah women of today who drive around in cars, who wander in the streets and public places and who labor under the impression that their decorated cloaks partly exposing their lewd denim type under garments are the ultimate degree of Shar’I purdah, should ponder and examine themselves in the light of the attitude of this noble Sahaabiyah who became the recipient of Allah’s special’s Salaam.
Female Craftiness
“Women! You are most ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen beings (such as women) that in spite of being deficient in intelligence and Deen are able to snatch away the intelligence of men…” (Rasulullah-sallallahu alayhi wasallam)
Non-observance of Purdah is an outstanding characteristic of non-Muslims. Islam emphasizes the adoption of purdah. Association with non-Muslims has led to assimilation with them and emulation of their ways and styles of non-Muslims.
Emulating the non-Muslims is termed Tashabbuh bil kuffar which is not permissible. Of graver importance is that we do not even consider our emulation to be wrong. When a misdeed becomes rampant in a community the evil of it ceases to be recognized. Now this evil of it ceases to be recognized. Now this evil misdeed of abandonment of purdah is considered progressive and a virtue.
In fact, abandonment of purdah is total humiliation.” (Hadhrat Maulana Masihullaah)




A Durban Brother poses the following questions to which we have provided very brief answers:

I pray and make Dua that Allah keep you strong and healthy and may you continue with the good dawah work you doing and May Allah guide the ulama to follow the Sunnah and Quran in the manner you do and may the munafiqs and hypocrites not lead our ummah astray.

My Questions are as follows:

1) Q. Mufti Menk on his tour to Durban with the association of Muslim Schools, Alfalaah College, Orient and several other ‘islamic’ (satanic – The Majlis) schools, organised a spiritual bayaan for students. (It was a shaitaani bayaan, not a ‘spritual’ bayaan. This dajjaal paves the path to Jahannam. He is Shaitaan’s agent – The Majlis)

t emerged that when Menk was called up, he said that they must remove the purdah or the partition between him and the girls/ladies as they are his sisters and children, as far as he is concerned there is nothing wrong in him giving a lecture without a purdah infront of women. (This is glaring evidence for the fact that this vile specimen of humanity or satanity is perhaps a real shaitaan in human form. Only a man who is obsessed with perverted sex is so eager to display his snout to females and to be in direct contact with the droves of faasiqaat who attended his corrupt ‘bayaans’ which are described in the Qur’aan Majeed as ‘Zukhruful Qaul’ -satanically adorned rubbish talk disguised with deeni hues- The Majlis)
He requested that the women do not video his bayaan. (This request is the effect of fear for the preservation of the evidence of his flagrant fisq and fujoor. If the fisq in which he is rotting had no shaitaani connotation, then why was he so scared for being photographed when he is a confirmed egotistical narcissistic Iblees? This character is paranoid with nafsaaniyat and shaitaaniyat- The Majlis)

Lastly he kept on saying he is not a hypocrite like all the other ulama and he knows what he is doing is correct. (In fact, he is the worst munaafiq and zindeeq fielded by shaitaan to undermine the Deen. Nevertheless, we do agree with this dajjaal that the vast majority of the molvies are ‘hypocrites’. They are ulama-e-soo’, but of a lesser category than himself. – The Majlis)

1) The claim of the Menk dajjaal is tantamount to kufr. When Allah Ta’ala ordered a purdah (screen) between Rasululah’s wives and the Sahaabah should the latter need to speak to them, then who does this immoral, faasiq/faajir think he is? He is a genuine munaafiq (100% thoroughbred hypocrite spreading satanism), and the Ulama in Durban are all of the Dayyooth category for maintaining silence and tolerating the kufr of this agent of Iblees.

2) Q. What is the ruling regarding an imam whose kurtah or jubbah goes lower than his ankles? The trouser generally doesn’t go lower than the ankles. What is the sunnah length of the kurta, jubbah and the trousers.


2) The Imaam whose garment is on or below his ankles is a faasiq. It is haraam to appoint such a person to be the Imaam. The same rule regarding the trousers applies to the jubbah/kurtah. The Sunnah length is midway between the ankles and the knees.


An Apa (a female teacher in a madrasah), cast into a moral and mental dilemma by the haraam immoral shenanigans of the so-called ‘ulama’ whose disregard for Hijaab and haraam interaction with the Apas spawn fisq, fujoor and even zina in the madrasah setting, laments:
“I don’t have trust in ulama. I have taught at an Islamic school and was taken advantage of physically by the moulanas and huffaaz at the school. When I decided to tell my mom and brother, I also decided to leave the school as money was not more important than my izzat (Imaani honour). My family couldn’t understand why I’m taking such drastic steps. They say that I have to just draw boundaries and move on.
I also left the madrassah which I myself had initiated. I stopped teaching as the aalim who came to help out and take charge of the syllabus, etc. made me feel extremely uncomfortable. Although he didn’t do anything physically to me, nevertheless I didn’t feel comfortable with him around me. My family was and still is extremely angry with me for leaving as they feel that I am paranoid and want to isolate myself from the world.
I don’t want to be in such a situation anymore as I feel that it is a place where one can loose one’s honour and morality. But as long as you are within the confines of the good books of the ulama, then you are accepted.
I’m sorry If I offend people with my strong point of view but I do not trust these ulama, my surroundings, or my family. I feel trapped and I am stuck. They have no problem with the things that I see wrong and morally damaging. I feel that like I constantly have to give up pieces of myself, explain myself and lose what I feel is right to be part of this community, my family and surroundings.
Please advise me what to do in this dilemma.” (End of the Apa’s lament)
The haraam abuse to which the Apa has been subjected by the evil molvis posing as ‘ulama’, is the tip of the iceberg of the shenanigans which these holy joe molvis perpetrate in an environment which is supposed to be a bastion of piety. The entire system at these so-called ‘islamic’ schools is haraam. The Qur’aan is abused, the Deen is abused, the Apas are abused, and a miserable mockery of the Deen is enacted by the molvis and the shaitaani organizations such as the NNB jamiat of Fordsburg which run these evil schools. And, all of the immoral dirt camouflaged with burqas, beards and kurtahs, is perpetrated in the name of Islam.
Their hearts are bereft of the slightest khauf for Allah Ta’ala. They conduct themselves as if they are atheists. Only atheists have no perception of Allah’s Presence and the presence of the Recording Malaaikah under whose watchful observation every person is 24 hours of every day of his life until the moment of the extraction of the Rooh by Malakul Maut.
Madrasah teachers and supervisors are supposed to be paragons of Islamic Morality and virtue, but these hoodlums who are the supervisors of the Apas and the schools are actually Satanists. Describing them, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that they are “wolves in sheep’s skin and devils in human form”.
Apas should not conceal the evil shenanigans of these molvis. Imaani honour is a priceless treasure which these villains are out to rob. Expose the villains and resign from these evil schools. Allah Ta’ala is the Raaziq. Rizq is predetermined and sealed. The Mashaaikh say: “Upon us is the obligation to worship Allah as He has commanded, and upon Him is the obligation of feeding us as He has promised.”
May Allah Ta’ala save the ignorant community from the vile depradations of these moral marauders. All their institutions – their devilish radios, their jamiats and their schools – are Satanist institutions for nafsaani gratification. All of their activities come within the scope of the Hadith in which a Sign of Qiyaamah is said to be:
“The dunya will be pursued with the amal of the Aakhirat and Knowledge will be pursued for reasons other than the Deen.”