Before the president announced the lockdown, the imaam of the Robertsham Musjid made the announcement of closing the Musjid. He justified the closure of the Musjid by saying that during the famine in Madinah, Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) had waived the penalty of cutting the hands of thieves. The imaam said that because of the famine Hadhrat Umar decided to override the law of cutting off the hand of a thief. Thus, according to the imaam at certain times because of the circumstances the Law of Allah can be overridden. Is this correct?
It is kufr bunkum which the moron sucked out of his thumb to bootlick the government. The Qur’aan cannot be overridden. Overriding the Qur’aan is Kufr. It is unthinkable that Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) had overridden the Qur’aan.
The moron is too stupid. He has not understood what he read in the kitaab. If indeed he does understand the statement of Hadhrat Umar, but tore it out of its context to offer bootlicking appeasement, then it is worse than stupidity. Perhaps stupidity may be a mitigating factor. But deliberate mutilation of the ahkaam and misuse of the Ahaadith are acts of kufr. The lesser of the evils to be adopted in favour of this moron imaam is to say that he is plain stupid and ignorant, lacking in the ability to even understand the texts in the Kutub.
It should be understood that all the ahkaam of the Shariah have conditions. The hukm applies when the conditions are found. In the absence of the conditions, the hukm will not apply. For example, Salaat is valid only with wudhu. If it is said to a person without wudhu that he may not perform Salaat, only a moron will conclude that Salaat has been suspended for him.
When it is said to a musaafir that whilst on the journey he may abstain from fasting, it will not be concluded that the Faqeeh has suspended Fasting due to circumstances. The Faqeeh has merely stated the hukm of the Shariah. He does not override the Qur’aan because the Qur’aan itself grants the concession.
Similarly, if in dire straits of life-threatening starvation a person consumes a bit of pork to save his life, it will not be said that he has overridden the Qur’aan because the Qur’aan itself allows for this concession. The hukm of cutting the hand for theft, has not been left to the opinion of morons. There are rules, conditions and restrictions applicable for the validity of this Hadd (prescribed penalty).
According to the Shariah, Sarqah (Theft) has a specific technical definition just as zina has. Theft which produces the consequence of cutting the hand does not bring every kind of theft within its purview. Stealing fruit and vegetables, stealing any valuables on display, stealing from a partnership business, stealing when driven by hunger, stealing from close relatives, etc. are all exempt from the penalty of cutting the hand. If a man steals anything which is not under lock and key, his hand cannot be cut off. All these exceptions have been explicitly mentioned by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
Now only a moron says that Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) has overridden the Qur’aan’s Law with his opinion on the basis of the circumstance of the famine. Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) had not stated anything new. He did not introduce a new law to override the Shariah or the Qur’aan. He merely stated the Law as Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had taught.

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “There is no cutting (of the hand of a person who is driven to steal) by the pangs of hunger.”
Presenting the tafseer of this Hadith, Shamsul Aimmah Sarakhsi states in his Kitaab, Al-Mabsoot:
“The penalty of cutting does not apply during famine because Dhuroorah (dire need) renders permissible eating from the wealth of another person a quantity sufficient for the need. Thus, this (the famine) prevents cutting. Makhool narrated that Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “There is no cutting (the hand) when the pangs of hunger prevail.”
Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) said:
“We do not cut (the hand) over (the theft of) meat, nor during a famine.”
This is the hukm of the Shariah. It was not the qiyaas (reasoning/opinion) of Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu). It was not a concession introduced by him on the basis of the circumstances. It was a law of the Shariah pronounced by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam). The moron imaam is too stupid to understand a simple mas’alah.
Qata’ yad (Cutting the hand) not being the punishment for stealing food, meat, vegetables, and the like, is not restricted to famine and dire straits of hunger. In normal circumstances too, the hand is not cut for theft of these products. Thus, Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) did not enact any new law. He merely informed of the Shar’i Hukm. There was therefore no need for Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) to resort to Ijtihaad for enacting a law for the exigency during the famine. The law already existed. But the moron Imaam being a member of the league of the Satanist Munaafiqeen, stupidly utilized his silly ‘ijtihaad’ in his ludicrous and abortive attempt to camouflage his kufr with some Islamic appearing veneer.
Of greater villainy than his stupidity is his attempt to elevate himself to the status of Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu). Assuming that Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) did temporarily suspend a Shar’i hukm because of dire circumstances, it would be perfectly acceptable and it would constitute a Law of the Shariah. Regarding Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu), our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “If a Nabi had to come after me, it would have been Umar.”
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Hold on firmly with the jaws to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly guided Khulafa (i.e. the Four Khulafa).” Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) equated the Sunnah of his Khulafa after him to his own Sunnah the observance of which is Waajib. Thus, the addition in the Fajr Athaan, the ruling of three Talaaqs issued in a single statement being three, banning women from the Musaajid, and the 20 raka’ts Taraaweeh being performed in Jamaat as we do, are the introductions of Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) which enjoy the Ijma’ (Consensus) of all the Sahaabah.
The moron imaam has attempted to elevate himself to Hadhrat Umar’s lofty status. The jaahil reasoned that since Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) had resorted to ijtihaad regarding the cutting of the hand mas’alah, he (i.e. this moron imaam) also enjoys similar authority which entitles him to resort to ‘ijtihaad’ on the basis of which the Musjid can be closed to appease the kuffaar when even the government had not ordered the closure.
Firstly, Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) did not override the Qur’aan. He merely stated the Law as Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) had laid it down. Secondly, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) placed the seal of authority on the validity of the Ijtihaad and enactment of ahkaam of Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu). Thirdly it is absolutely contumacious, self-conceited and the portrayal of ludicrous jahaalat for this jaahil imaam to believe that he has the same authority of resorting to ijtihaad as Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu).

12 Sha’baan 1441 – 6 April 2020


Bid’ah is abhorrent to Allah Ta’ala. The innovation of acts resembling Ibaadat is Bid’ah. Innovating such Bid’ah during plagues does not please Allah Ta’ala. The innovated wazaaif and supplications only add to the problems and misery of the plague. The plague is not ameliorated nor eliminated by Bid’ah. On the contrary, the devastation is intensified.
Haafiz Ibn Hajar Asqalaani (Rahmatullah alayh) states in his voluminous kitaab, Bathlul Ma’oon fi Fadhlit Taa’oon regarding baseless innovations during one devastating plague:
“In the month of Rabiul Awwal (during the plague), the people gathered (in Damascus) to make khatam of Bukhaari Shareef. By the Mihraab of the Sahaabah, they recited Surah Nooh 3363 times according (an instruction) which someone saw in a dream. Then the people made fervent dua for the elimination of the plague. But the plague became more severe.”
The plague continued with increased and unabated fury and devastation. Do not lose sight of the fact that the plague is either Shahaadat or Athaab. The Athaab of Allah Azza Wa Jal will run its prescribed course decreed by Allah Ta’ala. Nothing will stop or thwart it. Regardless of the desperate measures instituted in the panic-stricken communities, the plague will fulfil its divinely-decreed mandate.
In one plague Muslims introduced the Bid’ah of going to the outskirts of the city to perform Salaat and make dua as is the practice for Salaatul Istisqaa’ (Dua for rain). They even fasted three days. But the plague continued unabated.
In our time today, wazeefahs based on the dreams of some buzrugs are being circulated. Innovating such practices is Bid’ah and in conflict with the Sunnah.
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) and the Sahaabah who had suffered in the Plague of Amwaas, did not innovate any specific practices or wazeefahs.
The solution is not Bid’ah nor only Dua and Wazaaif. The remedy for the plague is Inaabat ilallaah. The fundamentals of Inaabat are:
Sincere Taubah (Repentance)
Reciting Istighfaar with sincerity in abundance
Renewal of the Mithaaq (Pledge). This is of absolute importance.
It is vital to pledge to Allah Ta’ala that the sins in which we had indulged will not be repeated. Submission to the Shariah and adoption of the Sunnah are incumbent factors of Inaabat ilallaah. Minus the Mithaaq, the wazeefas and duas will be of no avail.
Istighfaar, Tahleel, Tasbeeh, Tilaawat, Durood and Dua in abundance are also necessary. But minus Inaabat, these acts are not accepted.
There should be no organized khatams of anything. Everyone should perform Ibaadat in the privacy of the home and silently shed tears, imploring the Rahmat of Allah Ta’ala.
Grotesque, dark and bizarre fitnah is in the making. Worse appears on the horizon. The Ummah has been trapped in satanic luxuries and haraam pleasures. The consequences are now beginning to surface. Allah Ta’ala says in the Qur’aan Majeed:
“We shall most assuredly give them to taste of the lesser punishment, not the greater punishment. Perhaps they will return to Rectitude.
When we fail to derive lesson from the lesser punishment, the greater punishment will be unleashed with obliterating severity and consequences. The entire community will be uprooted, devastated and eliminated. May Allah Ta’ala have mercy on us. May Allah Ta’ala grant all Muslims the taufeeq for Inaabat. May Allah Ta’ala save us all from the dark shaitaani plots of the Munaafiqeen in our midst.

12 Sha’baan 1441 – 6 April 2020

emulating the kuffaar

Question: Is there any encompassing rule to determine whether something is Tashabbuh bil Kuffaar (emulating the kuffaar wal fussaaq) or not, especially with regards to clothes, eating, etc.?


There is no comprehensive principle regarding Tashabbuh Bil Kuffaar. The times and norms play a prominent role. Also, the wijdaan and baseerat of the Aalim of Haqq is important for determining this issue.

To correctly understand the mas’alah of Tashabbuh, there are three essentials: Ilm, Ikhlaas and Baseerat. Baseerat is the effect of Taqwa. Minus Taqwa, one’s ikhlaas will be contaminated. This contamination will eliminate Baseerat. The importance of Baserat could be understood from Imaam Abu Hanifah’s fatwa on the impurity of Maa-e-Musta’mal (used water). With his Baseerat he observed the spiritual filth in maa-e-musta’mal, hence his view is the strongest on this issue.

Without Ikhlaas and Baseerat, the view on an issue will be the emotion of the mufti maajin (a moron ‘mufti’ whose ‘fatwas’ are the products of his bestial nafs). Consider the example of western clothes. To which extent does Tashabbuh apply? The mufti maajin who himself may be wearing western fashionable dress styles will argue that the dress has become universal (aam) and there is no longer any religious connotation attached to it, e.g. the tie, hence it is permissible to wear shirt, pants, jeans, skippers, ties and all the miserable artefacts of shaitaan and his western progeny. Just imagine the level of jahaalat and mental convolution of even Ulama who argue that the satanic bermuda pants monstrosity is permissible simply because it is below the knees.

The baatini corrosion has blighted the intellectual perception so thoroughly that the mufti maajin fails to realize that a dress such as the bermuda pants is a pure western kuffaar fashionable dress item just recently introduced. Even prior to it assuming the decrepit and apodalic attribute of being aam, the maajin character proclaims it permissible simply on just one count, namely, the covering of the knees. Well, your wife’s ijaar and her burqah offer greater concealment of satr than the bermuda pants, and at the same time it is Tashabbuh bil Muslimah (emulation of a Muslim female), which rationally is better than Tashabbuh bil Kuffaar. Notwithstanding this fact, Tashabbuh bil Muslimah is also mal-oon (accursed). Thus, to a greater degree will a male who adopts kuffaar dress be mal-oon because of Tashabbuh bil Kuffaar.

However, the Mufti who focuses on the Aakhirat and who understands the maqsood (objective) of life on earth, ruminates with his Baatini (Spiritual) Heart and asks: Why does a Muslim want to wear shirt, pants, jacket, jeans, T-shirts and ties and strut about with a bared head, when Islamic dress is available, and when millions of Muslims are wearing such dress by which one can recognize from a mile away that the person is a Muslim? Careful reflection will convince one that there is the thief, shaitaan lurking in his nafs or it is the deception of his nafs which constrains him to proffer the ‘aam’ argument.

Since his nafs craves to don kuffaar garments because it is stylish and appealing to the desire, and it blends suitably with the kuffaar environment in which we live, he presents spurious arguments to justify such kuffaar dress. Little does he realize that in so doing he is according preference to kuffaar dress over and above Islamic dress which is easily available to him. This attitude thus confirms the element of Tashabbuh in kuffaar dress.

Someone may raise the argument that items such as jerseys, socks, shoes, raincoars and other necessary items of dress which all of us wear, are also of western origin. Does Tashabbuh apply here too? The response to this ishkaal (conundrum) is as follows:

Yes and no! At times it will be Tashabbuh and at times it will not be. In our environment and the circumstances in which Muslims work and live, these items are necessary. There is no suitable Islamic substitute for these items of dress. The idea of Tashabbuh is furthest from the mind. In this scenario the argument of the dress being universal is valid. Nevertheless, this still precludes such of these items which have entered society as the latest fashions. It also precludes footwear on whch appears logos and the like.

But, in a different setting such as India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, they are perfectly at home with a chaadar (shawl) thrown around the shoulders. They are comfortable in it and it does not interfere with their activities. Thus, for Muslims in those lands the element of Tashabbuh will be even in jerseys, and to a degree even in the type of shoes which we wear in the western world. The type of jooties worn in India and Pakistan suit them well although it is unsuitable for us here due to the flimsiness of the shoes and due to the feminine appearance.

A daleel for us is the amal of Imaam Abu Yusuf (rahmatullah alayh). After he became the Qaadhi and he had to do considerable walking, he changed his style of shoes and adopted the style of the Ajam. When someone objected, he explained that because of the toughness of these shoes he has adopted them.

In conclusion: In our environment, shirts, suits, ties, jeans, T-shirts and the like are Tashabbuh bil Kuffaar without the least doubt, and furthermore it borders on kufr because it is preferred over Islamic dress which is readily available. Preferring a kuffaar style over an Islamic style is a major sin of kufr proportions.

Regarding the practice of eating from tables and eating with knives and forks, the element of Tashabbuh is too glaring for the need to cudgel brains for the determination of the Shar’i Hukm. The argument of its ‘permissibility’ on the basis of this practice having become universal is contemptuously baatil. Abandonment of the Sunnah is haraam whether it is abandoned by a few or by the entire population. After fourteen centuries of the Ummah eating on the floor, suddenly the table and chair practice becomes ‘halaal’ on the decrepit and deceptive basis of ‘universality’. If this has to be accepted as a standard ‘principle’ for abrogation of Shar’i and Sunnah practices, the same fate which has destroyed the Shariats of Nabi Musaa (alayhis salaam) and Nabi Isaa (allayhis salaam) will mangle and mutilate the Sunnah which this Ummah of Muhammad (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) has followed since the inception of Islam.

Those who have adopted tables and chairs for eating, after abandoning their original Sunnah practice, are hovering on the brink of kufr for having preferred a kuffaar practice over and above the Sunnah practice. Those who have been eating in western style since birth, whilst not perpetrating haraam as the former group, nevertheless, are under Waajib obligation to abandon the kuffaar style and to adopt the Sunnah style. If, after having been made aware of this essentiality, they refuse, then they will be guilty of the haraam practice of Tashabbuh bil Kuffaar. And, Allah knows best.




At some Musjids we are hearing a new form of Athaan never heard of before. The Muath-thins have been ordered by the Musjid committees and even by some moulanas to add the words: Salloo fi buyootikum (‘Perform Salaat on your homes.’). Hadith is quoted to prove that in times of need there it is not necessary for people to come to the Musjid for Salaat. They should perform Salaat at home.
It has been said that although this concession was for the ease of the people during stormy weather, it today applies more because the plague is more harmful than heavy rain. Is this argument valid? Will the new form of Athaan be valid?

The Hadith in question has been torn out of its context and baselessly applied to the current scenario. The new style of Athaan is bid’ah and not permissible. There are several very important factors which proscribe amal (giving practical effect) on this Hadith in current context.

(1) The Sahaabah were fully aware of this Hadith. In fact, it was addressed to them.
(2) Plagues existed since time immemorial. Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) spoke about plagues and provided the necessary guidance for observance during plagues. Plagues are not new occurrences.

(3) During the era of the Sahaabah there erupted a severe plague which claimed the lives of many thousands. Numerous Sahaabah and senior Taabieen Ulama and Fuqaha were martyred in the plague of Amwaas in the Land of Shaam.

(4) Despite being aware of the Hadith, the Sahaabah did not implement it practically. The extra words mentioned in the Hadith were not added to the Athaan by the Sahaabah during the plague.

(5) Despite the ravaging plague of Amwaas as well as other plagues of greater severity in which millions perished, NEVER was the Athaan altered to accommodate the Hadith in question. This is so because the idea of closing the Musaajid and performing the Fardh Salaat at home never occurred to the Sahaabah and to the Ummah until this present era in which we witness a glut of munaafiqeen and bootlickers.
The Hadith in question was shelved unanimously by the Ummah from the era of the Sahaabah despite its authenticity and validity. Even today it is permissible to be absent from the Musjid should weather dictate such an exigency.

The concession of performing Salaat in the homes was issued in such an environment which made it extremely difficult for people to walk to the Musjid in real stormy weather. There were no paved pathways, and no tarred and concreted roads and pavements. No cars and other amenities as we possess today. The pathways to the Musjid were extremely slippery due to the clay-texture of the ground.

Nevertheless, if the weather is genuinely brutal, then it will be permissible to perform the Fardh Salaat at home. This is the ruling applicable to valid cases of need created by extreme weather conditions.

The concession has not been granted by the Shariah to assist in the establishment of kuffaar-created predicaments such as the current plague scenario. The objective of the concession is not bring about desolation to the Musaajid. The concession is not for the deprivation of the Musaajid of its sustenance, viz., Musallis. From the history of the Ummah from the very inception of Islam, this concession was not availed of during plagues. But today, munaafiqeen bootlickers have clutched on to this straw to displace the proper Masnoon Athaan, and to keep Muslims away from the Musaajid despite the eagerness of the latter to attend the Musaajid.

The two objectives of the concession are widely divergent. In fact, they are mutually repellant. The one objective is ease and comfort for Muslims. The other objective is the destruction of Islam by closing the Musaajid and preventing Muslims from executing the Waajib obligation of Fardh Salaat and Jumuah Salaat in the Musaajid.

When the Hadith was announced by Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), the people welcomed the concession since it brought ease and comfort. But, the kufr manipulation of this Hadith by the munaafiqeen and zanaadaqah has brought in its wake hatred and discontent. Muslims are angered for being prevented from the Musaajid by these agents of Iblees who act as Tajiki spies to betray them. There is no difficulty whatsoever to reach the Musaajid. The hyped up danger of the disease with the current magnitude of hyperbole, is shaitaani hallucination which befits only the munaafiqeen and kuffaar.

While the concession was used on rare occasions to bring ease and comfort to Muslims, today munaafiqeen are using it to prevent Muslims from the Musjid in violent conflict with their eagerness to attend the Musaajid. Thus, there is no justification for digging up this Hadith and rudely tearing it from its context to serve the designs of conspirators bent on the destruction of Islam.

These munaafiqeen are stupid, hence they portray their gross and contemptible stupidity by making fools of themselves in the domain of Islamic Uloom.

The Shariah has specified many valid factors to avail of the concession. Among these the following are specifically recorded in the Kutub:

Heavy rain, extreme cold, fear for the enemy, fear for wild animals, intense darkness (i.e. where lighting does not exist – no lamps, no street lighting. and no torches, etc.), blindness, paralysis, fear of arrest because of some crime committed, fear for being pursued by a creditor, sickness (real existing sickness, not imaginary diseases or anticipated disease, not bogey diseases), extreme old age, nursing an ailing person, etc.

In the lengthy list of exemptions granted by the Shariah, the plague is not included despite its severity. And, that is because Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that the Plague is either an Athaab or a Shahaadat.

Furthermore, according to the Shariah when a valid factor prevents one from attending the Musjid for Jamaat Salaat, then the absentee will receive the full reward of Jamaat Salaat. This is Allah’s grace and benevolence. But it has not been extended to the plague. As far as the plague is concerned the Ta-aamul of the Sahaabah, Taabieen and the entire Ummah throughout the history of Islam is ample direction and guidance for us.

It is haraam to present the plague as an excuse for closing the Musaajid, for convoluting the Athaan into Bid’ah, for banning the Fardh Salaat in the Musaajid and for the kufr of forcing musallis to stand a ‘kilometre’ apart in the sufoof in flagrant and kufr violation and rejection of the Fardh command of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) to stand shoulder to shoulder such as Bunyaanul Marsoos (a solid steel wall).
For these Munaafiqeen, the Qur’aan Majeed says:

“Who is a greater zaalim (oppressor) than the one who prevents the Thikr of Allah’s Name in the Musaajid and he strives to ruin the Musaajid?”
This Aayat of the Qur’aan applies most aptly to these munaafiqeen who have ruined the Musaajid to lick the boots of their atheist masters. Allah’s La’nat will most assuredly apprehend them.

The bootlickers have made a mockery of the Athaan with the bid’ah interpolation of the words: ‘Perform Salaat in your homes!’ When this concession was resorted to on rare occasions, the people were not aware that it would be invoked, hence they were prepared to go to the Musjid in the stormy weather.
When they heard the Muath-thin making the announcement, then whoever wished, remained at home. They had the choice of going to the Musjid or remaining at home. The Musjid was not closed nor was anyone debarred from going to the Musjid despite the weather.
But in the shaitaani scenario created by the munaafiqeen of our time, the Musaajid are closed. The people are aware of being debarred from the Musjid. They know that there will be no Salaat in the Musjid, hence they are compelled to perform Salaat at home. Now what is the meaning of stupidly and hypocritically announcing over the stupid loudspeaker: Salloo fi buyutikum? When the people are in their buyut (homes) knowing well that the Musjid has been satanically closed by the munaafiq agents of Iblees, then what is the rationale in the futile announcement?
The only reason for this bid’ah announcement is to dilute the kufr of having closed the Musaajid. The mockery of the Athaan is itself kufr. Despite the concession during stormy weather, no one may be debarred from the Musjid. If some opt for performing Salaat at home during stormy weather on the basis of the concession, others who are determined to go to Musjid are perfectly free to perform Jamaat Salaat in the Musjid. The Musjid is never closed nor can anyone be debarred.
The shaitaani mis-manipulation of the Hadith is glaring and kufr. It is a bid’ah camouflaged with the Hadith. This is what the Qur’aan describes as zukhruful qawl (satanically adorned statement) which the jinn devils urinate into the brains of human devils such as these munaafiqeen who have pillaged and plundered the Musaajid and convoluted the ahkaam of the Shariah into bid’ah sayyiah (evil innovation).


10 Sha’baan 1441 – 4 April 2020




What is the Shar’i status of a Muslim who reports other Muslims who go to perform Namaaz in a Musjid?


When the Russian communists had conquered the Muslim lands of Tajikstan, Uzbekistan, Samarqand, etc., annexing these Muslim countries to their then Soviet Union, these atheists had embarked on brutal genocide and extermination of Muslim communities and Islam.

Many Muslims in order to preserve their Imaan and the Deen would clandestinely perform Salaat and engage in Tilaawat of the Qur’aan Majeed in underground basements and cellars. Any Muslim caught in Ibaadat was liable for imprisonment, torture and even execution. While Islam was for all practical purposes eliminated in all the Muslim countries which had become Soviet Union communist states, many Muslims continued to hold on to the Deen in whatever way they were able to, underground.

Shaitaan had put in the field many Munaafiqeen such as those we have in our midst. These munaafiqeen would report to the Soviet authorities the underground Ibaadat activities of the sincere Muslims. Many were apprehended and persecuted. The Munaafiqeen in our midst who are reporting Muslims who engage in communion with Allah Ta’ala are of the ilk of the Tajiki Munaafiqeen. They are scoundrels and hypocrites of the worst kind of Satanism. They will sell their mothers and daughters to gain the opportunity of bootlicking the authorities. The La’nat of Allah Azza Wa Jal percolates from their faces and from every pore of their bodies. They are spineless swines and rats crawling most disgracefully behind the Yahood and Naasara right into their ‘lizard’s hole.’ They have extinguished their Imaan.

They are the satanic vermin for whom Allah Azza Wa Jal has prepared Darkul Asfal Minan Naar (the very lowest department in the dregs of Hell-Fire). Besides this horrendous Athaab awaiting them in the Aakhirat, Allah Ta’ala will break their necks here on earth, and at the time of Maut when their souls will be wrenched horribly from their noxious bodies, they will understand the meaning of NIFAAQ.

“(O Muhammad!) Inform the munaafiqeen that most certainly there is for them a painful chastisement. They (the munaafiqeen) are those who take as friends the kaafireen besides the Mu’mineen. What! Do they search for honour by them. (Know!) Verily all honour belongs to only Allah.” (An-Nisaa’, 138, 139)

These contemptible munaafiqeen and their kaafireen masters will be piled together and cast into Jahannam:

“Verily, Allah has revealed to you (O Mu’mineen!) in the Kitaab (the Qur’aan) that when you hear kufr and mockery being made of Allah’s Aayaat, then do not sit with them (i.e. the munaafiqeen) until they (do not abandon their mockery) and divert to another topic. (If you associate with them), then verily, you will be like them. Verily, Allah will pile together the munaafiqeen and the kaafireen into Jahannam.” (An-Nisaa’, Aayat 140)

Warning the munaafiqeen of Allah’s wrath, Hadhrat Umar (Radhiyallahu anhu) said: “Whoever seeks to gain honour from people, Allah will disgrace him.” These Tajiki Munaafiqeen among us who abhor Open Musaajid, Jamaat Salaat and Jumuah Salaat should ponder and understand that they will not escape the consequences of their despicable acts of betraying Islam, Allah Ta’ala, Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam), and the Ummah.
“They (these Tajiki Munaafiqeen) are cursed by Allah, and those (among the Mu’mineen) who curse, curse them…… Upon them is the La’nat of Allah, of the Malaaikah, and of the People (of Islam). Therein (in Hell-Fire) will they dwell forever. The Athaab shall not be lightened for them nor will they be granted any respite.” (Al-Baqarah)

9 Sha’baan 1441 – 2 April 2020



Among the causes of a plague is the prevalence of zina. When this filth becomes widespread, it becomes a cause for a plague. In this era both Muslims and non-Muslims indulge in fornication and adultery flagrantly and blatantly. In fact, zina and deeds of satanic perversion have acquired acceptance and even respect.

Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:

“When faahishah (zina, homosexuality and immorality of all kinds) become rampant, then plagues and such diseases will afflict the people, of which their forefathers had not heard.”

The planet earth is rotten with fornication, adultery, homosexuality, lesbianism and other satanic varieties of sexual perversion. Almost every Muslim indulges in cellphone zina. Indulgence in cellphone pornography is filth in which even ‘scholars’, molvis and sheikhs indulge.

Those who indulge in these cesspools of filth and moral inequity appear to be atheists. It is not possible for a true Mu’min to become addicted to such rot and filth. While a sin can be committed in a moment of ignorance and nafsaaniyat, a Mu’min does not become an addict of immorality nor does he pre-plan sin.

Remember that Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that when a person indulges in zina, his Imaam exits from his body and remains suspended. Should any one of the fornicators perish in the act, he dies without Imaan. This applies to even cellphone zina.

In terms of the Aakhirat, zina of the eyes, zina of the ears, zina of the tongue, zina of the mind and heart are also actual zina, i.e. the actual act of adultery. The punishment in the Aakhirat will be the same.

It is not surprising if the current epidemic is the consequence of the planet submerged in the filth of fornication, adultery, sexual perversion and the like.

8 Sha’baan 1441 – 2 April 2020




The Munaafiq fraudsters and liars of the NNB jamiat of Fordsburg, in an abortive attempt to sustain their satanic plot of destroying Islam with their fraud and chicanery, state in a copro-statement:
“After his appointment, Amr bin al’Aas addressed the people saying: “Oh people! (sic!) When the plague strikes, it spreads like wildfire, so seek shelter from it in the mountains (isolation).”
Suffering from stercoraceous brains vermiculated by the evil manipulation of Shaitaan, these NNB jamiat munaafiqeen as well as other munaafiqs of similar ilk are desperately struggling to obfuscate and mislead the ignorant masses of the Muslim community with downright lies and chicanery of the worst kind. Their satanic presentation of falsehood is of the worst kind since it aids their kufr of having banned the daily Fardh Jamaat Salaat and Jumuah Salaat. They further desperately manipulate their falsehood to justify closure of the Musaajid, a devilish act which had NEVER been enacted in the history of Islam since its very inception.
In the desperate bid to gain acceptance for their kufr by the Muslim community, these Khanaazeer and Shayaateenul Ins have presented a smattering of an episode of the Plague of Amwaas in which Hadhrat Amr Bin Al’Aas (Radhiyallahu anhu) features. On the basis of the Ijtihaadi (intellectual) misunderstanding of Hadhrat Amr (Radhiyallahu anhyu), the munaafiqeen are desperately labouring to extravasate a semblance of ‘proof’ for their dastardly kufr of having committed the worst acts of treason in terms of the Qur’aan Majeed. These munaafiq devils have closed the Musaajid and banned Jamaat and Jumuah Salaat weeks prior to the government’s lockdown order. They further introduced the kufr spacing of musallis in the saff, rendering the Salaat invalid, when this was not a compulsory demand of the government. They went down into the dregs of the sewer gutters where sewer rats dwell to lick the boots of the kuffaar by indulging in their exhibition of jaahiliyyah to show that they are the most faithful lackeys of the government. These munaafiq villains introduced such shaitaani measures which are at variance with the Shariah. Non-compliance with the silly shaitaani measures did not constitute a crime since such measures were not decreed as law by the government.
Regarding the narration pertaining to Hadhrat Amr Bin Al’Aas (Radhiyallahu anhu), the truth and reality are as follows:
(i) The advice of Hadhrat Amr (Radhiyallahu anhu) was an error of judgment or a misunderstanding. This fact shall be pursued further on.
(ii) The advice of Hadhrat Amr (Radhiyallahu anhu) was in conflict with the Qur’aan and the explicit and authentic Ahaadith of Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam).
(iii) Senior Sahaabah vigorously criticized Hadhrat Amr (Radhiyallahu anhu) for this grave error of judgment.
(iv) Hadhrat Amr (Radhiyallahu anhu) had acknowledged his error, hence retracted it.
The munaafiq NNB jamiat characters are either stupid and unaware of these facts or they have deliberately, but stupidly attempted to conceal the truth by presenting a quarter truth in the hope that their chicanery would not be detected. These moron munaafiqs believe that others too are morons like themselves.

Last Updated on Friday, 03 April 2020 11:03 



House Of The Munaafiqeen





Bismillaahir Rahmaanir Raheem



“Thus have We appointed for every Nabi enemies who are human devils and jinn devils. They whisper to one another adorned statements of deception (for misleading and deceiving) (Al-An’aam, 112)

An unknown entity dubbing itself ‘house of the ummah’, in an ‘open letter’ to Ta’leemuddin Madrasah of Isipingo Beach, has exhibited its  colossal jahaalat of the Shariah. In its pontification of jahaalat, which is an abortive attempt to change the Law of Allah Ta’ala pertaining to Salaat and the Musaajid, this miscreant entity in defence of the closure of the Musaajid, presents the following spurious and haraam arguments:


(1)  “The whole defiance is premised on the notion that it is a ‘sin’ not to pray in mosques, and those allowing such a state of affairs will be questioned by Allah.”

In this averment, the miscreant entity is alleging that:

(a)   The Mufti Sahib and the trustees of the Isipingo Musjid are acting in criminal defiance of the authorities.

(b)   It is not a sin not to pray in the Musaajid.

(c)  The Ulama and trustees who allow Salaat in the Musaajid will be questioned by Allah Ta’ala.

As for (a) above: The Mufti Sahib and the trustees of the Musjid are not acting in criminal defiance of the authorities as this munaafiq entity implies or alleges. It is the constitutional and religious right of Muslims to perform Ibaadat in the Musjid. This stance of the Mufti Sahib is based on the constitutional imperative of the freedom of religion as enshrined in the Bill of Rights. It is the government who is in violation of the constitution. In addition to having decreed large scale erosion of civil liberties of the whole populace, the government has totally eliminated our right of freedom of worship in our Musaajid.


For having trampled on our right of worship in the Musaajid, the government has shown no rationality. Its decree in this regard is bereft of rationality and legal validity. This point will be elaborated further on, Insha-Allah. At this juncture it suffices to say that the proclamation of the Shariah’s Law pertaining to Fardh Salaat with Jamaat and Jumuah Salaat in the Musaajid   should not in any way be misinterpreted to mean ‘defiance’ of the government.


(b) As for (b) above: The claim of the entity confirms its gross jahaalat. This entity has no right to open its mouth on matters of Shar’i import. It has exhibited its ignorance in this baseless averment.


On the contrary, it is a grievous sin – a major sin – a Kabeerah sin – to abstain from Jamaat Salaat in the Musjid. It is not permissible for males to perform Salaat at home when there is a nearby Musjid or even a Jamaat Khaanah. A male who absents himself from Jamaat Salaat is a faasiq.


A Musjid is not a recreational venue. It is not a hall for functions and merrymaking. It is the HOUSE of ALLAH where our Creator is worshipped with utmost reverence and dignity by worshippers who are pure – physically and spiritually.  The Qur’aan explicitly states that the Musaajid are exclusively for the Ibaadat of Allah Azza Wa Jal. Musjids are not museums.


The idea that it is not a sin not to pray in the Musjid is vehemently dismissed with contempt.  It is akin to kufr to make such spurious claims in diametric conflict with the Shariah. Jamaat Salaat and Jumuah Salaat are Waajib in the Musaajid. It is not permissible to perform Fardh Salaat in the homes in the vicinity of a Musjid.


Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said that he intended to burn down the houses of those males who absent themselves from the Musjid and perform Salaat at home.  Were it not for the women and children, Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) would have burnt down such houses.


In a genuine Islamic state, males who absent themselves from Jamaat Salaat in the Musjid without valid Shar’i reason will be arrested, and if necessary, whipped. 


(c) As for (c) above: What is the basis for this stupid spurious averment. In which Kitaab of the Shariah is this stupidity mentioned? Did the miscreant entity receive Wahi or Ilmaan from Allah Ta’ala for this ludicrous? There is absolutely no validity for this claim.


On the contrary, Allah Ta’ala will question and punish those Ulama who had aided the satanic cause of banning Salaat in the Musaajid and closing the Musaajid.  Such molvis and sheikhs are in reality agents of Iblees whose mission is the destruction of Islam. This miscreant entity which falsely avers to be a representative of the Ummah is also in the employ of Iblees to further his satanic mission.


Closure of Musaajid

(2) The miscreant entity alleges:

“The mufti in one of his clips goes so far as to state that those calling for the temporary ‘closure’ of the mosques are munafiques (hypocrites) ……With one stroke  of the pen, the learned Mufti  has virtually condemned, by implication, his fellow learned ulema of having excluded themselves from the fold.”

There is no need for relying on implication when stating the Haqq. Undoubtedly, those molvis who had closed the Musaajid and banned Salaat in the Musaajid are Munaafiqs and Murtads. Such vile molvis come fully within the purview of the Qur’aanic Aayat:

“Who is a greater zaalim (oppressor) than the one who prevents the Name of Allah from the Musaajid, and he strives in the ruin of the Musaajid?”

(Al-Baqarah, 114)



Last Updated on Friday, 03 April 2020 11:06 



Satanism is practiced and imparted by saahireen and saahiraat under Deeni guise. The names of Ulama of the past are cited to give the classes of Satanism ‘islamic’ credibility. Many ignorant Muslims are tricked and misled by these confounded haraam, kufr therapy snares.

They use their hands like sorcerers and witches in abracadabra displays to hypnotize and satanize stupid people. They satanize the brains of gullible and stupid Muslims just as the alcoholic sanatizers sanitize the hands.

All forms of abracadabra therapy are haraam and tantamount to kufr even if Qur’aanic verses are utilized. The utilization of Islamic terminology by these Satanists is for hoodwinking and trapping the gullible and the ignorant. Their objective is only monetary gain.

The ‘professional’ ruqyah gangs of tricksters are also of this Satanist ilk. Beware of them. They have become millionaires by means of their ruqyah / therapy shaitaani stunts adorned deceptively with Islamic terminology. The haraam boodle pours into their coffers from idiots who submit to this satanic baatil.

Practise your own valid Qur’aanic ‘therapy’. Allah Ta’ala says in the Qur’aan Shareef:

“Say (O Muhammad): ‘Verily, Allah misleads whomever He wills, and He guides unto Himself those who turn towards Him (with repentance and obedience). They are those who have Imaan, whose hearts derive peace by Thikrullaah. Behold! With the Thikr of Allah do hearts find rest,”

(Ar-Ra’d, 27, 28)
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said: “Your tongue should remain ever fresh with the Thikr of Allah.” At all times, in all walks of life, keep the Name of Allah Ta’ala on your tongue. Permanent Thikrullah with the tongue will embed the remembrance of Allah Ta’ala in the heart. This will bring about peace of mind and peace of the heart.

All the depression and mental unsettlement which people complain of are the effects of gross and flagrant sin. One of the consequence of the deluge of sin, transgression, cellphone, fisq, fujoor, porn and filth is depression which leads people unto drug addiction by taking drug-medication, and into the snares of the Satanist therapists – the saahireen and saahiraat (sorcerers and witches).

6 Sha’baan 1441 – 1 April 2020


Fatwa Of Mr. Taqi Usmani30032020


Is the following view of Mufti Taqi correct:
According to him if the Muslim ruler in a Muslim country suspends Jumuah
prayers because of some strong reason such as a medical reason or
something like it, then the ruling of the Sultan applies. He says that it is
written in Fataawa books such as Alamghiri that if the Muslim ruler
suspends Jumuah prayer, then you have to pray Zuhr at home. Only those
people are allowed to pray Jumuah at home who are living in non-Muslim
countries where Jumuah is suspended at Masjids.” Is this view correct?
Mufti Taqi has taken up residence in the domain of dhalaal (deviation) hence
he has become adept in issuing one cent bunkum fatwas which he substantiates
with Fiqhi and Hadith texts by misinterpretation to suit the whims of kuffaar
rulers with whom he associates and whom he bootlicks.
The texts in Alamghiri and other Kutub are not applicable to the kufr scenarios
prevailing today in the context of the virus plot of the kuffaar.
Pakistan has a decidedly kuffaar government. This kaafir government is not
like a Sultan who governs by the Shariah. Furthermore, never in Islam’s
history has any Sultan abolished Jumuah Salaat. No Sultan has suspended
Jumuah as Mr.Taqi seeks to convey by deception to the ignorant masses.
Mr.Taqi is satanically mis-applying the text of Alamghiri to provide kufr cover
for the kufr shenanigans of the Pakistan government regarding the current
virus panic. While according to the Shariah the kufr decree of the government
has no validity, people will automatically abstain from Jumuah, not because of

obedience to the kuffaar government, but on account of fear for the brutal persecution and oppression which will follow in the wake of defying the evil
rulers whom Mr.Taqi is supporting at the cost of ruining his Imaan.
There is no need for a fatwa to convince people to abstain from Jumuah in
Napakistan or in any other country where Jumua has been banned, Fardh
Salaat has been banned and the Musaajid closed down. A fatwa to abstain from
Jumuah is superfluous and stupid. People of their own accord will not go to the
Musaajid for fear of the brutality of the oppressive rulers and tyrants.
The motive of these munaafiq molvis and stupid once cent ‘muftis’ for issuing
fatwas to justify abstention from Jumuah and Fardh Salaat in the Musjid is
only to curry favour with rulers and governments. They most disgracefully lick
the boots of the kuffaar for the attainment of despicable nafsaani objectives.
The ‘medical’ reason posited by Mr.Taqi is satanically spurious. There is
absolutely no Shar’i validity for this bunkum reason urinated into the brains by
the devil.
The suggestion to perform Zuhr is another stupidity. Every Muslim, even the
fussaaq and fujjaar, with the exclusion of the zindeeqs and munaafiqeen, is
aware that when he is compelled by governmental oppression to forego
Jumuah, he has to perform Zuhr since there is no other alternative.
The stupid, kufr averment that “only those people are allowed to pray jumuah
at home who are living in non-Muslim countries where jumuah is suspended at
Masjids” clearly displays the malfunctioning of Mr.Taqi’s brains.
In Pakistan/Napakistan where Jumuah has been banned by the kuffaar
government on account of the virus bogey, the kuffaar rulers have done so in
submission to their kuffaar, conspiratorial masters. So far, the haraam kufr
order is the closure of the Musjids. The law has not banned performance of
Salaat – any Salaat – at home. It is therefore satanically stupid for Mr.Taqi to
claim that Jumuah Salaat while valid in homes in non-Muslim countries will
not be valid in Pakistan. He displays egregious stupidity in this satanic ‘fatwa’.
Rasulullah (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) said:
“Verily, I fear for my Ummah, the aimmah mudhilleen.”
In another narration, our Nabi (Sallallahu alayhi wasallam) expressed greater
fear for these deviate muftis and molvis – greater than fear for even Dajjaal.